Animalia
By Kristine Phillips
December 19 2017
Friend says story of woman mauled to death by own dogs doesn't add up
Rumors
swirled around the death of Bethany Lynn Stephens, a young woman from
rural Virginia who, authorities said, was mauled to death by her dogs
while out on a walk last week.
Many suspected that someone else
killed her and doubted that the dogs were responsible. Goochland County
Sheriff Jim Agnew said the misinformation, particularly on social media,
was widespread and has complicated the investigation. So he decided to
disclose one gruesome detail that he had been reluctant to divulge out
of concern for Stephens’s family — in hopes of reassuring the public
that there isn’t a killer on the loose.
Shortly
after officers found Stephens’s body, guarded by her two dogs, they
began talking about how to catch the animals. When they turned back
around, they saw that the dogs had walked over to the body.
“I
observed, as well as four other deputy sheriffs observed,” Agnew said,
then paused before continuing, “the dogs eating the rib cage on the
body.”
A friend of Stephens was later able to capture the dogs, the sheriff said.
Agnew
held a news conference Monday afternoon, four days after Stephens’s
father found her in a wooded area about a half-mile from a main road in
Goochland, Va., a community about 30 miles outside Richmond. Authorities
said the 22-year-old had been gone for about a day since leaving to
walk her dogs, so her father went out to look for her in the area she
frequented. There, he found the canines, guarding what he first thought
was an animal carcass.
“Ms. Stephens was terribly, terribly
injured, but it was very apparent to us that she had been dead for quite
some time,” Agnew told reporters, adding later that the damage to her
body “was so extensive that there was nothing left to compare bite marks
to.”
Agnew said many have inundated his office and social media
with calls, emails, attacks and false narratives about how Stephens
died. He told The Washington Post earlier that investigators don’t
suspect foul play and that evidence recovered from the scene, including
defensive wounds on her hands and arms, showed that the dogs were
responsible for her death.
Investigators also have looked into
statements from other witnesses, including the possibility that Stephens
was killed by someone or something else and that the dogs were trying
to protect her. But investigators don’t believe that is what happened.
Agnew said at least one of the dogs had a significant amount of blood on
its collar and neck.
“Now, having said that, we are still
following up on those. We’re still doing some forensic tests. We’re
still doing interviews,” Agnew said. “But . . . from the evidence that
we observed, from the evidence that we collected, that narrative doesn’t
fit.”
Authorities said the bite marks on Stephens, including the
ones on her skull, were consistent with canine marks. Had she been
attacked by a bigger animal, such as a bear, Agnew said, the bites
would’ve punctured her skull.
Shawn Whitlock, an investigator with the sheriff’s office, said there was no sign that she was killed any other way.
“Nothing
that said domestic violence. Nothing that said she was stabbed. Nothing
that said she was shot. No bones, no injuries to the throat area . . .
There was no particular bleeding inside the esophagus, which would’ve
been conducive with choking her out. None of that,” Whitlock told
reporters.
There is also no evidence that she had been sexually assaulted, authorities said.
Still, at least one question remains. Why did these dogs, who friends said had a strong bond with Stephens, turn on her?
“I don’t think there’s any way we can definitively say what caused the attack,” Agnew told reporters.
Sgt. Mike Blackwood of the sheriff’s office has a theory.
Stephens
had been living elsewhere and had left the dogs with her father. The
dogs, which were previously indoor animals, were left in a kennel
outside with little human contact, aside from a visit from Stephens
about five times a week, Blackwood told reporters.
“Just
trying to create a little background with what might have occurred with
that when they became a little distant from their owner towards the
end,” he said.
Stephens’s friend Barbara Norris was among those
who weren’t convinced by authorities’ account of her death, saying the
dogs, which Stephens had been raising since they were puppies, would
never turn on her, ABC affiliate WRIC reported.
“They’d kill you with kisses,” Norris told NBC affiliate WWBT.
Norris
said the dogs’ kennels looked as though they had been forced open and
suggested that something may have happened to Stephens after she walked
the dogs, so the animals forced themselves out to help her.
Agnew
did correct some misinformation that had come out of his office.
Authorities said earlier that the dogs were bred for fighting — a piece
of information apparently provided by one of Stephens’s friends.
“We have been able to follow that up today, and we have determined that that is false,” Agnew said.
Earlier
estimates that the dogs each weighed up to 125 pounds also were
overstated, he said, adding that he does not have the exact weight of
the animals. Agnew told The Post earlier that he estimates the dogs had a
combined weight of about twice that of Stephens, who weighed a little
more than 100 pounds.
“They were very large dogs . . . They were not quite that large, no,” Agnew said.
During
an earlier news conference, he had described the dogs as “very large
brindle-colored pit bulls,” although the dogs’ specific breeds are
unknown.
The dogs were euthanized Saturday, with the family’s permission.
“I
think it was in the best interest of our community and for public
safety to do that,” Agnew said. “Once a dog tastes human flesh, it’s no
longer safe to have that dog around humans.”
Their bodies are
being preserved until authorities find a lab that can perform a
necropsy, Blackwood said. Toxicology results on Stephens will not be
available for three months.
Agnew said Stephens’s family is convinced with investigators’ findings.
“They
are devastated. They are worn out. They are dealing with trying to
piece everything together and filtering out the misinformation. They
wish to remain private, and it’s been very difficult on them,” Agnew
said.
[But of course, there will be die-hard animal advocates who will absolutely never believe that dogs could turn on their humans.]
No comments:
Post a Comment