Saturday, February 24, 2024

STB gave grant for Taylor Swift concerts, event likely to generate major benefits for S’pore economy: Govt

 
Taylor Swift will hold six shows at the National Stadium from March 2 to March 9. PHOTO: EPA-EFE

Sarah Koh and Elaine Lee

FEB 23, 2024


SINGAPORE – The upcoming Taylor Swift concerts in Singapore, which are likely to generate significant benefits for the economy, got the support of the authorities in the form of a grant.

In response to queries from The Straits Times, the Singapore Tourism Board (STB) and the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) said in a joint statement that tourism sectors such as hospitality, retail, travel and dining are likely to benefit from the event, just like they have in other cities the pop star has performed in.

More than 300,000 tickets have been sold for the concerts in Singapore, with a large number of fans travelling in from other countries, they added.
The statement said: “Singapore has much to offer as a destination for large-scale international events, with our strategic location, quality infrastructure, safety, efficiency and diverse cultural offerings.

“The Kallang Alive Sport Management (KASM) will continue to actively bring a range of diverse lifestyle and entertainment offerings to the Sports Hub.”

On Feb 16, Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin said he was informed by concert promoter Anschutz Entertainment Group that the Singapore Government offered subsidies of up to US$3 million (S$4 million) for each concert – in exchange for Swift agreeing not to perform elsewhere in South-east Asia during The Eras Tour.

[This is the Thai PM giving 2nd hand info from the promoter. It could be a miscommunication or misinterpretation. Maybe he ask the promoter to bring the tour to Thailand and the promoter said SG provided grants, can Thailand also provide grants? And this was interpreted as "SG paid Swift so that she won't bring tour to other countries in SE Asia." ]



Several foreign media outlets, including the Bangkok Post, reported that Mr Srettha made the comment during the iBusiness Forum 2024 in the Thai capital Bangkok.

The American singer, who won her fourth Grammy Award for Album of the Year earlier in February, will hold six shows at the National Stadium – which is part of the Singapore Sports Hub – from March 2 to March 9.

Singapore is Swift’s only stop in Asia apart from Japan.

The joint statement on Feb 20 said that in the case of Swift, MCCY and KASM recognised that there will be significant demand from Singaporeans as well as fans across the region for her to perform in Singapore, and worked directly with AEG Presents for her to do so.

“STB also supported the event through a grant,” it added. MCCY told ST on Feb 21 that it is unable to provide details about the size of the grant or the conditions attached to it due to business confidentiality.

Since the Government took back the Singapore Sports Hub, KASM – a wholly owned entity under MCCY – has been working “to make it more accessible and vibrant for all Singaporeans”, the statement said.

It added that KASM works with event organisers to create a “uniquely Singapore experience” for Singaporeans and visitors, and “makes use of its strong global relationships, and the multidisciplinary experiences and expertise of the KASM team”.


Mr James Walton, sports business group leader at Deloitte Asia Pacific, said it is not uncommon for cities and venues to secure exclusive arrangements, although it is not often that he sees countries strike such an exclusive deal, “the reason being that most acts want to reach their entire fan base as much as possible, and so tour as many locations as possible”.

Bidding wars have occurred in the past – for example, between the Singapore Grand Prix and the National Stadium over acts that were touring in Asia around the same time of the year, and both were trying to get the acts to perform at their venue, he added.

In 2023, the Western Australian (WA) government announced that the state had secured exclusive domestic rights to two Coldplay concerts in Perth and called it “a massive coup”. It declined to reveal how much it spent to lure the British band to the city, but its Tourism Minister Rita Saffioti told Sky News Australia: “This is just another form of creating jobs and growing the WA economy.

“Tourism is a big job creator… so this is all about making sure we build our tourism product. We give people a reason to come to WA to experience WA and maybe come back.”

A country-exclusive touring set can sometimes occur out of necessity due to the dates available, Mr Walton added.

He also noted that there are benefits for both parties, including higher prices for the host stadium due to the exclusivity, and convenience for the performer, who can also get tax incentives, and cut down on travel and logistics costs and stadium set-up costs.

Mr Joshua Loh – who is course chair for Ngee Ann Polytechnic’s diploma in tourism and resort management – said it is not uncommon to offer financial incentives in exchange for anchoring major events that can help boost tourism and brand cities as vibrant lifestyle destinations.

“Usually, the returns for the destination, in terms of tourism receipts from the major event, would significantly outweigh the financial incentives disbursed,” he said.

Dr Seshan Ramaswami, marketing associate professor at the Singapore Management University, said Singapore is drawing more than just tourists with its efforts to establish itself as a city with world-class recreation and entertainment infrastructure capable of hosting significant events.

In the longer run, he said, it can attract foreign talent, especially in the creative industries, and companies to consider Singapore as their Asian or global base.

In 2014, Swift cancelled her sold-out Red Tour concert in Thailand in June that year, reported the Bangkok Post. The official cancellation notice on her website said this was “due to recent events in Thailand”.

The Thai army had taken control of the country and imposed a curfew and martial law following the May 22 military coup that year.

AEG and Swift’s publicist Tree Paine have been contacted for comment.




[So... Straits Times asked STB and MCCY point blank... and instead of giving a straight answer that "No, Singapore DID NOT pay Swift to perform exclusively in Singapore", they answered obliquely - that SG has provided Swift with a "grant". 

So I wondered, why would a highly successful concert tour require a grant? What was the purpose of the grant? At what point was the grant provided? Because concert tours are usually planned quite far ahead - tickets for the Mar 2024 concerts were on sale in July 2023! So plans would have been made a year ahead or even earlier. If the tour was intended to go to Thailand, it would also have been announced then. 
If SG wanted exclusivity, they would have to negotiate more than a year ahead. Which is not impossible for a govt that plans very far ahead. But would US$3m a show be sufficient for Swift to give up other cities? It is clear "profit". Whereas, to put up a show in another city will involve logistics and costs, and booking a venue, etc. And then you get just a percentage of the takings. It sounds plausible and the non-denial from STB and MCCY makes it likely. 
But at the same time, I think there are other considerations and the way this unfolded, I am more inclined to think that there are other factors considered by the concert promoter/organiser. And then there was the 2014 cancellation due to the military coup. Maybe the organiser have to ask themselves, "would there be another coup in the next 12 months or so?" With Thailand, chances are better than fair.
They would have had to book the venue almost a year in advance (if not earlier), and they would have had to scout for viable locations, consider crowd control, security, logistics, and whether there might be a coup, and then they would have to cancel the show, etc. So if the Thai PM wanted Swift to bring her concert to Thailand, he would have had to ask the promoter about a year in advance. So my last question is, Would Swift have agreed to give up other cities for a US$18m "grant"? Or more accurately, would Swift agree to give up SOME of her fans for $18m? 

Honestly, I don't know.]

[Addendum - found this a few days after I posted the above :

SINGAPORE: In early 2023, a team from Singapore flew to Los Angeles to meet leaders from the sports and entertainment world, as American pop star Taylor Swift was about to embark on her United States tour.

At the time, no international venues had been confirmed for the superstar’s The Eras Tour run.

A few months later, the Singapore team, working with concert promoter Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG), promised to “deliver Asia” to Swift, thus setting in motion a deal for an unprecedented six-day run of concerts at the National Stadium in Singapore – the only South-East Asian stop of her tour.

The Singapore dates were announced in June 2023.

Swift will hold six shows at the 60,000-capacity venue from March 2 to 9. More than 300,000 tickets have been sold for the concerts in Singapore, with a large number of fans travelling in from South-East Asia and the rest of the world.

“KASM (Kallang Alive Sport Management) initiated the idea (for the tour to come to Singapore) and led the discussions... We were the proactive ‘tip of the spear’ for the Government in these discussions that were had,” said KASM chairman Keith Magnus, speaking to The Straits Times on Feb 23.

“Once the discussion had progressed and we saw the opportunity of holding an only-in-Singapore event, we then thought it made sense to take a whole-of-government approach and brought in other relevant agencies to really have Team Singapore bringing in Team Taylor.”

Magnus took over the corporate entity established by the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) and Sport Singapore to manage the S$1.33 billion facility in Kallang in December 2022.

When asked if an exclusivity clause was baked into the agreement with Swift’s team, he said there was “certainly an understanding that it was an only-in-Singapore event, (and) that’s how it was branded”.

On Feb 16, Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin said he was informed by AEG that the Singapore Government offered subsidies of up to US$3 million (S$4 million) for each concert – in exchange for Swift agreeing not to perform elsewhere in South-east Asia during The Eras Tour.

The Singapore Tourism Board and MCCY then issued a joint statement saying that the upcoming concerts got the support of the authorities in the form of a grant, but stopped short of saying how much was pumped in.

When pressed, Magnus also did not elaborate on the specifics of the deal, nor the grant amount.

He is confident that moving ahead – whether a concert is a Singapore exclusive or otherwise – the Republic remains a draw for artistes.

Coldplay, for instance, played six shows in Singapore as part of its Music of the Spheres World Tour earlier in 2024, compared with two days in the Philippines and two days in Thailand.

“It’s now a proven model that if you are an artiste and you want to be in Asia to cater to the Asia fan base, you really just have to come to Singapore, play here,” he said.

He added that “fans are able and willing to travel to Singapore to have a great experience and participate not just in the concert, but a broader offering of what the country has to offer”.

The enormously popular tour is currently making a stop for four days in Sydney, where Destination New South Wales projects more than 100,000 visitors will flock to the Australian city, generating an economic benefit of A$80 million (S$70.7 million).

Swift’s seven shows across Australia’s two biggest cities from Feb 16 to 26 could generate A$1.2 billion in economic value in Melbourne alone, according to the city’s Lord Mayor Sally Capp.

The Singapore team’s maiden trip to Los Angeles was a catalyst for KASM “to understand and see what was possible on the global stage with marquee events”, said Magnus.

Calls had already gone out to draw the sporting and entertainment world to Singapore in October and November 2022, even before the Government took back the Singapore Sports Hub, according to Magnus.

“We had already begun making calls around the world, signalling that Kallang was going to be beating to a different drum,” he said.

“If the vision was to be the premier (entertainment and sports) destination, then we needed to be proactive.”

The Sports Hub, which Magnus noted is seeing the dividends of this now, has already had a jam-packed 2024.

Juggernaut act Coldplay played a six-day run of concerts at the National Stadium in end-January, while Ed Sheeran, with extra seating, drew a record crowd of 60,000 people to the same venue on Feb 16.

In January to April, the venue is expecting to welcome more than 900,000 visitors for concerts alone, with pop star Bruno Mars’ three dates in April expected to draw around 150,000 concertgoers. In March, the sporting venue will also host the Singapore v China World Cup qualifier.

Experts conservatively estimate that Coldplay’s concerts alone would have contributed a revenue of $96 million to Singapore’s gross domestic product, said Mr Zachery Rajendran, programme chair for the diploma in integrated events management at Republic Polytechnic.

“The impact of Taylor Swift’s concerts could possibly surpass that,” said Mr Zachery, adding that the temporary influx of travellers for such concerts brings a myriad of benefits to Singapore, ranging from economic growth to cultural enrichment to global recognition.

Magnus wants to continue to build on the momentum and ensure that the world of sports and entertainment “knows that there is a great partner they can have in KASM”.

“It’s almost an investment banking DNA and passion that’s been brought into the operating culture of the organisation... We are constantly in deal mode,” said the chairman and chief executive of investment banking firm Evercore.

“In order to do that, we have to be proactive and thoughtful in curating both world-class as well as national-class (events) to appeal to Singaporeans and visitors alike.” - 

The Straits Times/ANN

]

[Addendum 2 (1/3/24)
Edwin Tong on the deal that brought Taylor Swift to Singapore
To summarise, SG wanted Taylor Swift because her concerts here would be good for Singapore. And it is a purely commercial decision. Swift's Eras Tour will bring economic benefits to Singapore, and Singapore was willing to offer Swift and her organisation the "whole package" to bring her tour to Singapore. And it is not simply the grant (which Edwin Tong hints is not as large as the figures being bandied about in the media), but other support infrastructures and the quality. And KASM is not just a passive venue manager, but was pro-actively seeking out (in this case) the Eras Tour and working with them on the logistics, the marketing and promotion, the ticketing, etc. In other words, SG (and KASM) made it easy for the tour organiser to say yes. 

]



No comments: